Well. Fp beat me to it 
i was trying to put dcaSOL into words that made sense to everyone other than me.
I think both have uses.
DcaSOL - offers a highly configurable option for everyone. The more configurable the better. Its a heavy lift I imagine for the dev team.
XxxSOL - is still valuable as it offers projects a visible asset associated with their token. It gives teams a new option to use vs launching a token. They can simply use the LST as their governance & split rewards w holders on top of the staking rewards.
It also could have an impact on how teams design tokenomics. They could put x numbers of their treasury into the LST & use that for traditional buckets like community or even treasury general. This allows for market buying to get their token which is then distributed however they want while holding SOL in their treasury. From there the options are nearly limitless w how they use it. I think the potential of tokenSOL for teams could be extremely powerful. Whether it DCAs or not.
For the dcaSOL a setup fee could be charged where it is converted to CLOUD or you need to bond Cloud to create the dca.
Same for tokenSOL
I guess the question then is at what point would the attachment of CLOUD make it less adoptable on a broader scale.