CLOUD potential Utility

This post’s goal is to discuss and propose possible utility options for cloud

What Drives CLOUD’s Value Today?

A. Speculation

Some treat CLOUD as a proxy investment in Sanctum. Since there’s no direct way to invest in the protocol, CLOUD becomes the next best thing.

There’s also speculation that revenue sharing or deeper value accrual might be introduced one day.

B. ASR Rewards (Active Staking Rewards)

Staking CLOUD gives very high ASR, which has led to:
Borrowing CLOUD just to stake and farm.
Treating it as a short-term yield farming tool.

This works for now, but let’s be honest — these returns are unlikely to be sustainable long-term. Once ASR cools off, the incentives weaken significantly.

C. Governance-Driven Buys

When an important vote goes live, people buy CLOUD to participate.
But most votes aren’t really controversial or high-impact — so buying pressure is inconsistent, and volume stays in general.


The Core Question: Why Hold CLOUD?

Right now, there’s little incentive to hold CLOUD other than to farm more CLOUD or wait for votes. And even in governance:
Voting “yes” = Buy CLOUD during the vote
Voting “no” = Hold sCLOUD and sell it during the vote
This makes long-term holding irrational. Most users only act when there’s a vote or a yield opportunity.
Without deeper utility, CLOUD is reduced to a farm-and-dump asset.


But Sanctum Has Momentum — Especially with INF performance recently ,tvl growth and revenue growth
It’s worth noting: INF is doing extremely well right now. Adoption is growing, integrations are expanding, and Sanctum is positioning itself as a major player in the LST space on Solana.
This growth presents a huge opportunity.
CLOUD could be part of that momentum — if it’s integrated meaningfully into Sanctum’s core products.
Instead of being a side token for voting, CLOUD can become a key to unlocking value within the ecosystem, especially tied to INF.


Ideas to Build Real Utility for CLOUD

Here are some ideas to give CLOUD long-term value by tying it into the Sanctum ecosystem:

1. Priority Access to Yield Products (INF-Focused)

Holding sCLOUD could grant access to:

Special Kamino SOL pools with fixed borrow APYs.

Designed for low-risk INF looping, capped if necessary.

Access could be whitelisted based on sCLOUD balance.

This aligns CLOUD utility directly with INF’s success and would create real demand from power users.

2. Lower Slippage or Fees on LST Swaps

Following Jupiter’s lead, sCLOUD holders could get:

Reduced slippage or better fees on Sanctum swaps.

Could function as indirect revenue sharing.

Implementation could involve rebates or routing boosts.

This makes sCLOUD more valuable for active traders and LST swappers or even arbitrage traders.


Conclusion

CLOUD was built for governance — but today, it’s mostly used for farming and speculation.

With Sanctum’s growth, especially through INF, there’s a real chance to turn CLOUD into a powerful, integrated utility token — one that unlocks real value across the platform.

If done right, CLOUD could go from being optional to being essential — not just a governance token, but a core part of the Sanctum experience.

Would love to hear:
What kind of utility would make YOU hold sCLOUD long-term?

Disclaimer these are some things I feel would be useful. I have no technical background and I for sure try to help and not hate on the team. What I propose are just examples and my goal is to raise awareness on the lack of usecases and utility for cloud which result in less buy pressure and decouples it from Sanctum imo

6 Likes

Gm Double,

Reduced fees, lower slippage, better routing, boosted APYs- all reserved for sCLOUD holders. This directly connects CLOUD utility to Sanctum’s LST infrastructure. It mirrors what platforms like Jupiter are already doing, and it can:

  • Incentivize active DeFi users to accumulate sCLOUD
  • Make CLOUD a productivity tool, not just a speculative one
  • Encourage recursive use (looping, arbitrage, routing)

CLOUD doesn’t need to be everything at once- but right now, it’s underutilized. Sanctum has real traction (INF growth, TVL, adoption), and CLOUD could be the connective tissue that ties user incentives to that growth.

The key is making CLOUD necessary, not just optional- as you said, moving it from a passive token to an essential one.

Real utility starts with conversations like this.

7 Likes

I believe Sanctum has a great product. I don’t believe in straight revenue sharing. Governance imo is not enough for a token to thrive. And like fp said Sanctum is headed to b2b so there are not many things to vote for. Thank you for taking the time to read it.

1 Like

Whats the Whitepaper say? What was it launched for?

Keep cloud as a governance token. Launch another token for utility.

A governance token can have also other types of uses. A great example is aave. Utility and governance together create better demand. I don’t see why a second token would be a better option.

1 Like

Agreed that CLOUD can have more potential uses.

Initially i thought the creator coin product can be one way to utilise creator coin for voting but it was decommissioned. I think we can expect future products to keep cloud in mind to give it more value as the team should be already thinking how to give more value to cloud.

Not sure if theres a problem but staking vs liquidity. Lower liquidity means less appealing to traders?

1 Like

Because you cant have cake and eat it too. People believe the value of governance is in the token which then equates to the FDV of the protocol/dapp. That is NOT the case. The Token is not an equity share of anything unless it is a tokenized RWA.

So why do we keep confusing the two? Governance tokens utility is to help steer the protocol to serve your interests. Thats why you vote on proposals. Nothing else.

The value of having a seat at the table is what the market will assign it.

Has anyone read the $Deepbook White Paper on SUI?

Personally speaking, to me governance is almost worthless, coz my small bag is not heavy enough to make any difference. But I luv what Sanctum is building. If you compare the TVL with the current market cap there is a stark assymetrical opportunity. Revenue share like what Raydium or Jupiter do to me is a no-brainer - and should be implemented asap.

1 Like

For sure liquidity can be an issue but I feel like this can be fixed as cloud grows. It wasn’t an issue before it dropped 90%in value.

1 Like

It will be done eventually when revenue is big enough. The real question is if there are smarter ways to use revenue in favor of the token than just distributing it.

I understand that it is not an equity share. I just want to give you as example Ray and orca that have been using revenue sharing to reward staking. Unfortunately using a governance token to reward holding/staking/voting token won’t get you far if there is no utility and sufficient buy pressure for it. Governance is not possible to make sufficient buy pressure.

I am not a crazy guy that just wants price to go up. I firmly believe that if a token is decoupled from growth it can be an issue. Remember that cloud also is a way for the team members to finance. It can also act as an incentives tool, and if the token is not strong it can do that efficiently.

Creating a second token will just fragment the value created by the project for no apparent reason imo. Governance after all is not the same in sanctum aka futarchy which makes token even more worthless

1 Like

I think there iss still room to explore creative token models that go beyond voting- think utility in B2B integrations, access layers, staking for services, or alignment mechanisms between partners.
Thank you for this interesting Topic.

1 Like

In general I think if Sanctum LST/INF users or even trader benefits from holding Cloud it could really highlight Sanctum’s value in the Solana eco

1 Like

What is Jupiter already doing for their JUP holders in their product? What about it do you like?

1 Like

I was specifically referring to jupiterZ which basically features no slippage/fee swaps in certain pairs.
Considering Sanctum is trying to grow INF I think providing lower slippage/fees if possible (paid off through revenue) for INF Swaps if someone holds sufficient amount of scloud. That’s the analogy I was going for. Although this is not a Jupiter feature that is only available to jup holders I think it would be a great addition for Sanctum considering most major players/wallets are mainly worried about slippage/fees in large swaps when it comes to LSTs

  • Revenue sharing(future potential)
  • Community airdrops
  • Discounts and incentives

slippage and low fees is also a point to mention. Thats why i use JUP almost daily.-

1 Like

Revenue sharing shouldnt be the utility of a governance token. It is utility of a utility token. I think the entire crypto space is making them synonymous.

What happens when RWA are more prevelant on chain. The token will represent the asset. Governance tokens will govern the protocol/dapp.

Youll be rewarded on holding the utility token, and the governance token will give you rewards of influencing the direction of the protocol/dapp, and therefore have value in the voice you have, not the revenues generated.

Looking to the future, better to change our thinking and models now to get in sooner, than when everyone else jumps in.

Buy your voice while its cheap. So when whales and institutions come in to have a voice, they will have to pay higher premiums to holders (us).

Unfortunately raydium and orca don’t agree with that :joy: Their governance token is also a revenue sharing vehicle. But if you read carefully I don’t propose straight revenue sharing.

2 Likes

Who said Orca and Raydium know what theyre talking about? Models change, ecosystems and products evolve.

IMHO, all Im saying is, i do not understand how this model is sustainable when RWA are coming on chain.

You will have a governance token that allpws you to conduct voting transactions. And a utility token that will allow you to conduct the transactions of the protocol.

Equity, Ownership of a protocol will adhere to common terms and mechanisms, a tokenized stock certificate bought and sol on exchanges like Kamino and Jupiter.

So where does it leave us… im thinking. Lets leave cloud alone. Lets conventrate on pumping products that male much more revenue and are not so long term investments

We have proven token valuation systems in the Solana ecosystem that serve as examples. It’s clear that nothing is perfect, regardless of the protocol.

A DeFi token should represent the value of community involvement from those who invest in it. Returning a portion of the revenue to them is the best way to increase engagement in governance.

You just have to look at JUP’s +20k live audience during the calls, and the 90% of token-represented voters who stake and show interest.

Dare to form partnerships, dare to share value. Our community will only become stronger and more involved.