Good Proposal pbear.
One suggestion it might be helpful to define a review mechanism that re-evaluates reward sizing annually based on actual participation levels, market conditions, and treasury health. That way, we leave the door open for upward or downward adjustments without being locked into a rigid 5-year curve.
it might be helpful to define a review mechanism that re-evaluates reward sizing annually based on actual participation levels, market conditions, and treasury health. That way, we leave the door open for upward or downward adjustments without being locked into a rigid 5-year curve.