Actually, I don’t like red cloud logo. The blue one is still perfect.
why not have it changed every month ?
just for fun, but the original should remain IMO. Looks good and it is easily identifiable among all my servers and bookmarks.
A definite yes for either one (cloudie emoji or cw’s creation). Although I do think Cloudie Al Gaib is more fitting for this moment.
Here’s why this is, by far, a positive and productive action for sanctum and the community:
- A temp logo visually marks the start of governance and staking, reinforcing that big changes are happening in the Sanctum ecosystem. It builds hype and momentum, showing the community that this is a pivotal moment in Sanctum’s evolution.
- A temporary logo change can spark curiosity and discussion, bringing more attention to our governance and staking. It encourages more participation from the community, especially those who might not be fully engaged yet.
- A special logo can symbolize decentralization, power, and participation, reinforcing the message that $CLOUD holders now have a say in the future of Sanctum.
- When the temp logo is later replaced, it becomes a part of Sanctum history, making it memorable and nostalgic for the early adopters who were there at the beginning. It can also be repurposed for NFTs, POAPs, or future events, making it even more valuable as a historical marker.
A temporary logo change isn’t just cosmetic - it’s a powerful way to mark a major milestone, increase engagement, and solidify Sanctum’s identity as a decentralized, community-driven ecosystem. A temporary logo change has been done many times before and proven to have positive effects. This has nothing to do with what colors you like or tradition. It’s about giving a signal and marking a special moment for sanctum and the community, and in effect creating buzz as zero cost marketing.
“Lead them to paradise.”
I vote Yes. proposal is governance
I know this is mostly in jest, but I think you do raise a legit concern with X.
That place is hugely unstable right now.
I keep hearing more and more horror stories about accounts losing verification or being taken down and there being weeks to months of silence from the customer service team (spoiler alert: I’m pretty sure there’s virtually no one left in the building now the election is over and the owner got the result he wanted).
On top of all that I’ve now seen 3 separate, detailed, reports of extortion happening within X from staff over account bans. All of them have been pulled down by X so lending a lot of weight to their accuracy (X is not free speech in case anyone was still operating under that delusion).
This is a risky change because of all this, even if it’s just for a week, so my vote is no.
Love the new logo! I vote yes!
Ill be voting yes. The logo is trash but going to test out how this new governance works.
I vote NO.
I think changing the logo seems to indicate that something is wrong and the project needs to be refactored.
This would be true if it was actually a new logo. But it’s just a variation. I don’t think that gives the impression of problems. And it’s TEMPORARY.
I vote yes ,but the logo is not my priority.
I will be honest, I don’t like this logo.
I prefer black and white…
Monday I will be there to test the governance mechanism…
I thinh from branding point of view shold not do that.
I don’t think this proposal will make a big difference either way, so I’ll be selling $CLOUD in the market if it goes 5% above the spot price but buying if it goes 5% or below the spot price
I think we could look for another way to honor our partners, changing the identity of our protocol is bad for business, and our logo doesn’t match red
The current logo for me is still the best option!
Not crazy about the logo…
I agree with the idea.
But I think it’s hard to convey the purpose.
Everyone’s distracted by other things at the moment.
I hope this is enough to pique their interest.
That’s how boring Sanctum is right now.
I hope this is just a test vote. I didn’t like this one.
A Big No
Blue logo is always attractive.